Iowa care facility cited for second death in 15 months
Northridge Village in Ames, Iowa. (Photo via Google Earth)
A central Iowa care facility that was cited for contributing to the death of a resident last year was cited this week for a second death.
Northridge Village of Ames was cited this week for a death in September that stemmed from a resident’s untreated urinary tract infection. Last year, the home was cited for a June 2021 death that resulted from a resident’s fall at the facility.
The recent death has triggered a $13,000 fine from the state, although that fine has been suspended while the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services considers the imposition of a federal penalty.
A state inspector’s report indicates that on Sept. 9, a male resident of the home showed signs of anxiety and was complaining of pain and being cold. In recent days, the resident had also experienced hallucinations and his urine was noted to be dark in color, with a strong odor — all of which are signs of a potential urinary tract infection. A nurse aide had also noticed a discharge that pointed to a urinary tract infection, according to inspectors.
On Sept. 13, the resident was found sitting in his recliner, with his mouth open, unable to answer questions. The resident was taken to a hospital for an emergency evaluation where he was diagnosed as hypoxic, with an oxygen saturation level of just 68%, far short of the 90% level that is at the bottom of the normal range.
He also had a white blood cell count of 25.4, two to five times the normal range, and showed a decline in kidney function, according to inspectors’ reports.
The hospital diagnosed the resident with severe sepsis, secondary to a urinary tract infection, respiratory failure, brain swelling and acute kidney injury The man died five days later, on Sept. 18, and the death certificate listed the cause of death as sepsis due to a urinary tract infection.
State inspectors alleged that Northridge policy called for nurses to respond to any signs of an infection by completing a report through the home’s Infection Watch software program that would ensure close monitoring. The home’s infection-control nurse allegedly admitted to inspectors that no Infection Watch reports had been completed for the resident in September.
An aide who was interviewed by inspectors reported that she had repeatedly told a nurse that the man had dark urine and increased confusion that might signal a urinary tract infection. The aide was “emotional during the interview,” the inspectors reported, and said she didn’t feel anyone was listening to her when she reported the man’s symptoms.
A registered nurse at the home told inspectors he was aware that several staff members had known of the man’s symptoms. He allegedly said he didn’t report the symptoms to the home’s nurse practitioner or physician because those symptoms were a “known issue” and everyone already knew about them.
Northridge was cited for a total 12 state and federal regulatory violations, including insufficient nursing staff. Inspectors reviewed the call-light response times for four residents over a 24-hour period and noted seven instances in which those residents waited 18 to 34 minutes for staff assistance.
A year ago, Northridge was fined $10,000 for having contributed to another resident’s death in June 2021. In that case, a resident fell after being improperly transferred to the bathroom, where she fell and broke her hip.
The woman died three weeks later, with the certificate of death listing the immediate cause of death as complications from the hip fracture, and the manner of death was listed as an accident.
The $10,000 fine was reduced to $6,500 when the home agreed not to appeal the penalty.
Northridge Village Administrator Kayla Zellmer referred all questions on the state’s actions to the home’s management company, Pivotal Healthcare of Overland Park, Kansas. Pivotal Healthcare’s spokeswoman could not be reached for comment.
The company’s attorney, Kendall R. Watkins, said Northridge Village plans to appeal the state’s findings.
“We strongly disagree with the department’s findings,” he said. “There is additional information that we are presenting that was not referenced in the statement of deficiencies that shows the facility was in compliance with the federal and state rules. The facility is a quality operation with satisfied residents as shown by its multiple awards.”
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.